May
23
Will survive lesbian and feminist social the next disaster?
History has shown us that the ancient societies – China, India, Egypt, etc.. . All have strong family ties. Why? There is only one reason. In the case of famine, war or other problem where food is scarce, if you are in a strong-knit family, are one of the survival vermindert.Feministinnen strong and lesbians, which guarantees that the small-to-no children. Therefore, it is not likely to survive a future disaster. Is that good? Will feminine women, the family set about ego and have a loving husband and five children survive from feminists? Do these women with caution to modern feminists grin?
I think they smile. Think about natural selection. of course, the woman with five children will survive longer. hard to pass on your genes with no children.
I think I can almost anything to survive, the company throws at me. The company has forced me to be a survivor.
I would not touch this with a 10 foot pole. . . . but to see and I’m sure you enjoy the answers
Well, if homosexuality is passed in the genes, then we are ready to get far fewer homosexuals in the coming decades if the sexual orientation of parents doesn’t play a role, then nicht.Unsere society is complex, there’s blood lines was a bad choice, however, if not all, the system is infected, those who stick is good book and reproduce those who dont, they will also make full use of contraceptive pill vasectomy (players do not want to support a child) and of course my all time favorite, the anti-machine prostitute Abtreibung.Wenn all of our society, San Francisco, then yes things wouldnt too well, they would?
Except that lesbianism is not genetic (when it succeeds, it would probably never come about), nor is feminism, it is an ideology. Every woman, regardless of race can werden.Ist lesbian disposal of lesbian love well? For birth rates might be for the porn industry suck and the imaginations of people everywhere. Personally, I could no less care of one or the other.
Quote: “History has shown us that the very old companies – China … They all have strong family ties. Why? There is only one reason. In the case of famine, war or other problem where food is scarce, unless one is greatly reduced in a strongly-knit family, one of the chances of survival are. “Get your facts right. Strong family ties are in China, because our culture demands that a family be together not only for the unit, but also for respect. Younger generations are needed – ideally – to live with the older generation back to repay his kindness in obtaining ihnen.Wenn general, the poorer families had to live apart so that the younger generation could search for food and money, while the wealthier families could afford, under one roof with four generations of children, grandchildren, great-grandparents, children (live with the idea??) unterstützen.Du to have your facts back to China lost .— Oh yes, thumbs down me. I know nothing about China, even though I am Chinese.
There are a variety of reasons for the decline in the birth rate in developed countries. Unfortunately they are wrong and base your opinion on generalizations in an attempt to learn the lessons of antiquity to the present application. Do you not much more than family size has changed? In addition, the nations where the birth rates are lowest, even those least vulnerable to such events. (Not that it can not happen, they’re just more rare.) Personally, I’m not worried. And I shake his head sadly in women who have never been a place for themselves in their lives and hope that they wake up and speak.
where food is scarce, a small family would logischer.die small families that are now often spread because of high costs of living in developed countries (in two families with a feminist women and those without). There are feminists with “large” families. my friend is raising four children and have it Feministin.stark knit families had not much of a chance against the Nazis, Pol Pot, the atomic bomb, etc.
Contrary to your ignorance, get married feminists DO and children.
Why did you change your name so often?
Feminists have loving husbands and children too. So if that suggest what is true, I would say yes, it will überleben.Wie gay men fit into your theory?
Hate to break it to you, but the children of today are less likely for their aging parents than they were yesterday nursing. So, children are not a guarantee of lifetime support.
For this to work, feminism would have to genetics, it is not. And feminists have just as many children as the “non” diversity. Can they prove not? Also, why are you leaving out gay men, but condemn lesbians? It would not because you “only” hate women, it would be?